mitchchang
Well-known member
Here's the entire live-streamed performance link:
Here's the entire live-streamed performance link:
very amateur sound setup - they were all just playing through individual Fishman amps sitting on the stageThanks for sharing. The audio on the video was rough and was clipping when people were playing.
Err... nope.It looks like charging for set-ups is going to be an on-going thing in the world of ukuleles?
No, that is not what I said. I suggest you stop putting words in my mouth.Are you saying that this leading seller is not going to continue to offer a set-up as an add-on? Maybe this is just a one off?
Kalas (not Elites) and other low cost ukes (lower end Anuenue, Kumu, Leolani, etc ) don't get free setups at TUS. Pono and above $400? do. It's been like that for awhile, pretty sure it was discussed on this very board when the change was made.This is a recent advertisement from a popular seller on UU showing the charges for set-ups in low cost ukuleles. Are you saying that this leading seller is not going to continue to offer a set-up as an add-on? Maybe this is just a one off? View attachment 143132
Also right here in this thread.Kalas (not Elites) and other low cost ukes (lower end Anuenue, Kumu, Leolani, etc ) don't get free setups at TUS. Pono and above $400? do. It's been like that for awhile, pretty sure it was discussed on this very board when the change was made.
Well, this made it to 20 pages. My wife bet me twenty bucks it wouldn't. I won. Time to close this thread. I realize I don't have to read it but the popcorn bag is empty after 20 pages of "down the drain with ULTP".
Yes, this.^^^ It's not a new thing, it has been that way for a while. Comparing TUS wuth ULTP is like comparing night and day.Kalas (not Elites) and other low cost ukes (lower end Anuenue, Kumu, Leolani, etc ) don't get free setups at TUS. Pono and above $400? do. It's been like that for awhile, pretty sure it was discussed on this very board when the change was made.
or clean water and a tainted well. Which do you want to drink from ? Would you chance the drink from the tainted well - not me.Yes, this.^^^ It's not a new thing, it has been that way for a while. Comparing TUS wuth ULTP is like comparing night and day.
Here's the entire live-streamed performance link:
I bought my first tenor, a Pono RTC(S) from TUS in Oct. 2017. At that time a full setup was included for all ukuleles they sold. 2 day FedEX shipping was free for orders $400 or more. From the listing:This is a screen grab of an advertisement from another vendor competing with ULTP, check out the cost of a set-up. I am not sure if this is a new thing for this site or if they have always charged extra for a set-up on lower cost instruments. The more expensive instruments on this site have the cost of the set-up included in the purchase price. I saw a video where the owner said it is a cost to do set-ups, but it is an add-on that reduces the chances that a customer will return a uke because they don't like it. It looks like charging for set-ups is going to be an on-going thing in the world of ukuleles?
View attachment 143131
Oyster dinner with oysters from our local harbor. We're goin' for thirty pages this time bb lol.Well, Patrick, were getting there... If we keep going off track like this we will make it for sure...
What was the over/under again? What was the bet for 40?
Username checks outI don't understand why anyone is defending his actions. There's marketing and there's fraud, the two are not the same. His fictional perpetual sale pricing is fraudulent because it's against FTC promotional guidelines. Period.
Federal Trade Commission on this practice:
And, I'd be very surprised if the State of California didn't also have something on the books about this type of shady behavior.
And, before the whataboutisms or the lazy red herring that it's just capitalism, Mim, SUS, etc. providing added value to distinguish themselves in a competitive market is capitalism.
But, deceptive pricing isn't capitalism, it's just fraud.
So. . . If so many UU folk are in agreement that this business's practices are shady and likely outright fraudulent, what keeps you (all) from filing an official complaint through FTC's consumer reporting portal? As someone correctly stated earlier in this thread, fact and libel/ slander are mutually exclusive, thus there is nothing to fear but fear itself, and there is both safety and credibility in numbers (e.g. a significant volume of filed complaints).I don't understand why anyone is defending his actions. There's marketing and there's fraud, the two are not the same. His fictional perpetual sale pricing is fraudulent because it's against FTC promotional guidelines. Period.
Federal Trade Commission on this practice:
And, I'd be very surprised if the State of California didn't also have something on the books about this type of shady behavior.
And, before the whataboutisms or the lazy red herring that it's just capitalism, Mim, SUS, etc. providing added value to distinguish themselves in a competitive market is capitalism.
But, deceptive pricing isn't capitalism, it's just fraud.