- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
- Messages
- 3,435
- Reaction score
- 4,019
post #524! i think i just set a rekkid!
The ONLY negative interaction I have ever had with Rich Davis is when I saw he posted a video trashing the Enya Nova U Pro Tenor despite never having even had one in his hands. i posted on his video that it was wrong to post a video describing something he had never seen. He took the video down. That is literally it.From watching his video, he stated he had an unpleasant experience with Mims before all of this. Perhaps he took offense at Baz at some previous time period as well and this fueled his negative comments about him.
But yes, I would think there would be wisdom in not taking stabs at and making conclusions about an inflamed issue that has involved multiple parties without even seeing the video and admitting you have few facts about any of this.
It didn't say anything unsavoury - it was me posting that I thought his charging for setups was a joke - that led to a LOT of people commenting about their bad experiences with ULTP - some about the paying for setups, some about paying for photos, some about dealings with him directly - it was all very calmly worded to be honest and nothing offensive and in fact a few saying they'd had good experience. Overall though the 'picture' the comments painted (not me - the commenters) was overwhelmingly negative to ULTP.Um. Wow. I mean, I get it, FB can get pretty out of hand (any social media can) with people responding, but I sure didn't think Baz's blog post was offensive in any way. I could tell he was pretty pissed off by his post, but he kept his language very reasonable, IMO. I am not on FB so I don't know what Baz's original FB post looked like, but if it was anything like any of his comments on the YT video or his blog post, I can't see that it would be worth shutting down, unless the follow up comments got unruly (certainly possible).
i think that there's at least one over a thousandpost #524! i think i just set a rekkid!
I agree with you as well.I don't understand why anyone is defending his actions. There's marketing and there's fraud, the two are not the same. His fictional perpetual sale pricing is fraudulent because it's against FTC promotional guidelines. Period.
Federal Trade Commission on this practice:
And, I'd be very surprised if the State of California didn't also have something on the books about this type of shady behavior.
And, before the whataboutisms or the lazy red herring that it's just capitalism, Mim, SUS, etc. providing added value to distinguish themselves in a competitive market is capitalism.
But, deceptive pricing isn't capitalism, it's just fraud.
Ko'Aloha offered a branded ABS case for a short time in 2018/2019 that was only available from their Factory Store. (Similar to Crossrock ABS cases.) I bought one and it is very nice and fit my 2017 KTM-00 tenor very snugly.Speaking of cases.... when I bought my Koaloha from a HNL ukulele shop they included the Koaloha case for free. Same exact case at #1 is $150, marked down from $199 (ukes are the same price everywhere). I'm not sure they are even that much at the factory. wrt TUS, they have the Koaloha case for $95 and on occasion they will include an Oahu case for free with purchase of a Pono, even the plain old Mx/Ax/MGx.
Those are not Oahu, the shape and fit (not as much extra room at the headstock), placement of latches/handle, etc. hardware are all different. A store owner in Waikiki told me they were made by another maker, but that maker/brand would not confirm. The Oahu case could be a little nicer, but the Koaloha fits perfectly.Ko'Aloha offered a branded ABS case for a short time in 2018/2019 that was only available from their Factory Store. (Similar to Crossrock ABS cases.) I bought one and it is very nice and fit my 2017 KTM-00 tenor very snugly.
View attachment 143180
A Ko'Aloha branded Oahu hardshell case is presently available at TUS. I think this case offered elsewhere as well.
View attachment 143181
Yeah, but you are posting and driving the pages up! Are you scamming her?Oyster dinner with oysters from our local harbor. We're goin' for thirty pages this time bb lol.
Some manufacturers still have a lowest advertised price rule, for example Martin for guitars. But retailers have all freedom to set their price as high as they want. If there are people stupid or desperate enough to pay the inflated price then you can not really blame the retailer. It will become a big problem if other retailers follow the practice, or manufacturers rise prices because people are willing to pay the price. Therefore we must support all efforts that steer people toward the lowest price and the good deals.I agree with you as well.
Manufacturers traditionally set an MSRP (Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price) precisely so that the retailer can advertise that they have marked the item down XX% below the MSRP.
Even TUS has a sale price indicated for many of their ukes. I assume this is based upon MSRP.
ULTP appears to have taken this concept and pushed it to an extreme.
In the bad old days, a Mfg of a popular product could set a standard price for a product that all of the dealers/sellers had to follow. If they advertised or sold the item for a lower price in their region, the mfg or distributor would threaten to drop the dealer from their authorized roster. There were a number of lawsuits brought against this practice and it was deemed unlawful in several states. (Under creating a monopoly I believe.) But, various forms of pressure on the sellers still exist to persuade them to stay in line.
Price wars seldom benefited anyone except the consumer. If you see an ad that says the "price is too low to show." Or, put the item in the cart to see the reduced price. Etc. It's related to this. Sellers don't want to irritate the Maker or distributor with a lower price than what other dealers are selling the item for. But they may be willing to cut into their profit margin to close out an item. Or, it may be gray market items.
post #524! i think i just set a rekkid!
Except that's NOT what's happening here. He's pretending that he's offering a discount from an allegedly prior, higher price. See attached screenshot. In the US, that's deceptive pricing per the FTC. In the United States you cannot pretend that you are offering a discounted price, when in fact you never sold your product for the higher price to begin with and have always sold the product for the supposed discounted price.Some manufacturers still have a lowest advertised price rule, for example Martin for guitars. But retailers have all freedom to set their price as high as they want. If there are people stupid or desperate enough to pay the inflated price then you can not really blame the retailer. It will become a big problem if other retailers follow the practice, or manufacturers rise prices because people are willing to pay the price. Therefore we must support all efforts that steer people toward the lowest price and the good deals.
Oyster dinner with oysters from our local harbor. We're goin' for thirty pages this time bb lol.
you sure can BB but it's Drayton Harbor in Blaine, Wa.. Dang one more posting towards thirty pages.If I help, can I join you?
Your local harbor is Bodega Bay CA, right?
Quite agree - and when it comes to these Flight ukes - I don't think I've EVER seen that higher price figure mentioned anywhere on the planet! That's about twice as much as retail..Except that's NOT what's happening here. He's pretending that he's offering a discount from an allegedly prior, higher price. See attached screenshot. In the US, that's deceptive pricing per the FTC. In the United States you cannot pretend that you are offering a discounted price, when in fact you never sold your product for the higher price to begin with and have always sold the product for the supposed discounted price.
What he's doing has nothing to do with MSRP or a manufacturers lowest advertised price rule. Completely different issue.
I think she already did a few pages back, Baz...By the same token, I can only assume that Heather Carter will also be targeting this site - a post that invited comment and led to many opinions being aired. EXACTLY the same...
Only, she won't - obviously...
Yep - very odd. And of course slander would only work if somebody was making stuff up - the comments I saw that they objected to were personal stories from disgruntled customers, not lies.I think she already did a few pages back, Baz...
The whole "bully" thing is weird. It sounds very childish; you'd think if they really thought someone was trying to harass them they'd call it harassment, or slander...you know, the legal terms that adults use. Maybe just generational differences in language, I dunno.
Now THAT would be fun.At this point, neither of them would have the stones to come on here and comment, believe you me.
I'd consider buying a ticket for that, maybe even VIP!Now THAT would be fun.